0800 9705 177

Who’s the abuser, and who’s the victim? In today’s family courts, that question isn’t always answered with facts — it’s often decided by ideology, bias, and buzzwords, re watch this 80's classic music video for some insight.

Imagine a woman throwing knives near a man’s head, stalking him, leaving threats behind. If the roles were reversed, he'd be arrested on the spot, deemed a risk, remanded, and painted as a monster. But when the abuse doesn’t fit the state's narrative, it’s ignored — especially if the victim is male.

“Safeguarding” wasn’t even used in children's law until the 2000s. Originally created for vulnerable adults, it was repurposed by Children’s Services and now appears in nearly every private law case, often with zero factual basis. It's become the perfect tool to control contact, mask false allegations, and create state-sanctioned parental alienation.

For every man who harms a woman, there’s a woman who harms a man. For every story of a father failing his child, there’s a mother doing the same — but only one narrative dominates headlines, courtrooms, and government guidance. Why? Because it’s easier to push state-funded agendas when society is divided and distracted.

Men are often too proud or too scared to report abuse. The system shames them. It doesn’t believe them. Meanwhile, CAFCASS encourages mothers to make allegations with no evidence — and the court listens.

The legal definition of domestic abuse is so broad now that:

• Raising your voice is “abuse.”
   
• Disagreeing is “controlling.”
   
• Applying to court is seen as “litigious harm.”
   

CAFCASS and HMCTS are now judge, jury, and social commentator — not law enforcers. These are civil trials based on probability, not proof beyond reasonable doubt. Meanwhile, the CPS often finds no criminal offence, but family court punishes you anyway.

• A father can’t register his child’s birth alone.
   
• Rape, in UK law, still cannot be legally applied to women offending against men.
   
• Parental Alienation is dismissed in court as “just another form of abuse” — but strangely, only when it’s the father raising it.
   

This is not justice — this is control.

Domestic abuse is real — but it should be dealt with by the Police and CPS, not CAFCASS and secretive courts. When we blur the lines, we hurt real victims — male and female. We also hurt children, who are left voiceless in a system obsessed with control, not care.

During the pandemic, the elite broke their own rules while we grieved, isolated, and suffered. They laughed, profited, and protected their friends. It’s the same in family court — they win, we lose, and children pay the price.

They want men and women arguing online, so we don’t look up and realise who’s really in control. But there are more of us than them. The only way forward is unity, truth, and peaceful resistance.

Cut out the media. Turn off the TV. Ask questions. Learn your rights. Talk to each other. Stop believing everything they say about domestic abuse, about men, about family separation.

Abuse has no gender. Children have two parents. The state has no right to own your family.

The public image of CAFCASS is a carefully crafted illusion. The truth? They are not independent, not child-focused, and certainly not trusted by families. Their priority is simple: money.

If your child is under five, they often won’t even speak to them. If over five, they’ll “interview” them — often leading, coaching, and planting narratives. We’ve seen it firsthand.

At one CAFCASS office, we witnessed something shocking: leaflets on rape, drugs, and sexual violence on full display where children wait. What message does that send before they speak to a stranger about mum or dad? It’s grooming — psychological manipulation at best.

CAFCASS was pushed into law in 2001, despite mass public and professional opposition. It was never asked for by families. It was created to shift blame and generate revenue — disproportionately targeting fathers, under the guise of “child welfare.”

Make no mistake: they are matriarchal, misandrist, and institutionally biased. Even politicians like Theresa May and Ann Widdecombe have called CAFCASS a waste of public money — yet they still exist. Why? Because they feed the machine: HMCTS, CMS, and the legal system that profits from your family’s pain.

When you apply to family court, CAFCASS will contact you without warning. You don’t have to engage. Just say no. Hang up.

Instead, you can:

• Print and submit an independent report on CAFCASS to the court (we provide this).
   
• Tell the court you do not trust them and request an Independent Social Worker (ISW) instead.
   
• Use a Part 25 application to formalise your request — and yes, we can help you with that.
   

CAFCASS has failed children for 23 years. Their reports are often inaccurate, biased, and damaging. Genuine positive feedback is almost impossible to find — unless it’s coming from their own staff.

If you believe in fairness, accountability, and child welfare, it’s time to stand up and say:

“We do not consent to CAFCASS.”

The Child Maintenance Service (CMS) isn’t about children — it’s about money. Run by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), CMS acts as a state-backed debt collector, charging a 20% fee to the non-resident parent just to handle their own payments.

If any private company did this, it would be called fraud, coercion, or illegal money collection. But because it’s the government, it’s rebranded as “child maintenance.”

Out of around 1 million CMS payers, over 800,000 are men. Many more are coerced into “pay-to-see” private deals, threatened with family court if they don’t comply — all while knowing the system overwhelmingly favours the resident parent, usually the mother.

CMS will demand money immediately when contacted by the resident parent — with no investigation into how custody was obtained, even if it was through alienation, obstruction, or family court bias.

If the non-resident parent can’t or won’t pay?

• Passports are seized.
   
• Driving licences are removed.
   
• Prison is used as punishment.
  Meanwhile, the resident parent faces no consequences for breaching contact or neglecting co-parenting duties.
   

How does CMS know your income? Simple — the DWP, HMRC, and CMS all share your private financial data, without consent. And because CMS payments are factored into benefit calculations, it’s effectively a state subsidy for single-parent households — paid for by the other parent.

It’s not about child welfare. It’s about replacing state support with forced private payments:

Another tax. Another profit stream.

• Be self-employed and keep your lifestyle simple.
   
• Avoid large assets that can be targeted.
   
• Use platforms like Our Family Wizard (OFW) to log and share expenses fairly.
   
• Document everything.
   
• And for those ready to take a stand:
   

STOP PAYING.
Change your bank account. Refuse to be extorted.
They can’t jail us all.
 

It’s time to force reform through mass civil peaceful non-compliance, public exposure, and peaceful pressure.